The Parkland U15 Female Rangers played a pair of games against Brandon, this past weekend.

On Friday, the Rangers lost on the road, 7-0, with Morgan Gouldie recording 44 saves.

On Saturday in Dauphin, Brandon scored a 4-2 victory. Dara Robak and Hannah Robson, scored the Rangers’ goals, while Maliya Malowski picked up an assist and Olivia Brown made 43 saves.

The two teams will meet again, this Friday in Russell and the Rangers will face the Eastman Selects, Saturday in Niverville.

On Oct. 8 and 9, 2022 McConnell School of Irish Dance student, Charleigh Carefoot, was in Dayton, Ohio, to compete in the Cumann Rince Náisiúnta (CRN) Western Regional Championships.

Carefoot competed in three CRN levels of competitive solo dances on Oct. 8 - Bunghrad, Ullmhuchan, and Meanghrad - with podium finishes for her dances.

On Oct. 9, Carefoot competed in her Bunghrad Award dancing the Reel and the Slip Jig back-to-back and received a perfect score from all three adjudicators giving her the title of Western Regional Bunghrad Award winner under 14.

Carefoot has been dancing with the McConnell School of Dance for nine years. 

By Ed Stozek
Herald Staff

One of the first mishaps at No. 10 Service Flying Training School (SFTS) occurred on March 20, 1941.

Pilot-Officer Thompson reported hitting a tree on Riding Mountain while giving Leading Aircraftsman (LAC) Heal, a student pilot, instruction on instrument flying. With substantial damage to the wing, the plane returned to the airdrome and landed successfully. Thompson was charged with low-flying. Damage to the Harvard plane amounted to $750 and necessitated shipping the wings to a depot for repair.

On April 9, 1941, one of the courses, Course No. 25, started with the majority of the class composed of student pilots from Brandon’s Manning Pool. By June 21, 49 attained their “wings”, two failed, seven were “washed out’ during the course and two were killed due to plane-related fatalities.

Group Captain D.W.F. Bonham-Carter made the presentation, addressing a few words of congratulation to the graduates individually as he pinned the wings on their chests.

At the conclusion of the ceremony he addressed the class as a whole, telling them to be cautious and not to take unnecessary risks but not to hesitate to take whatever risk arose in their line of duty. Thirty-two of the graduates were posted overseas and 17 to CFS Trenton for further training as instructors.

As the courses progressed, mishaps kept the maintenance crew busy. By May 1, there were 12 accidents. If repairs couldn’t be made at the crash site, the crew dismantled the wings and loaded the downed plane onto a truck.

On May 23, in his daily reports J. S. Williamson, F/L noted, “Two accidents today. Nobody hurt. Must be a lot of spare horse shoes around, everyone seems to be so lucky. LAC Tate, J.C., student pilot in Harvard 3783, low flying in Fisher River area – 46 miles north. Struck a backhouse (outhouse) in the Stony Creek school grounds with his port wing. Aileron and seven feet at outer end of wing torn off. Backhouse disintegrated. Tate managed to fly back to the aerodrome minus aileron and half of wing. Made a perfect landing. Two charges laid against him of low flying and endangering life.”

The next day Tate was charged before W/Cdr. Wilson and remanded for a summary of evidence to be taken by S/L Dupont.

The other accident involved LAC McLachlan, W.J.A. who force landed in a Harvard, seven miles north of No. 10.

“The aircraft turned over on its back, damaging the rudder and prop. Repairs were made on the spot and craft was flown back. McLachlan forgot to close the altitude control when doing aerobatics resulting in a ‘conked’ engine.”

On May 24, the first fatality occurred to LAC Bolton when his Harvard plane spiraled into the ground at 11 p.m. while on solo night flying practice from the relief field north of Dauphin. The plane hit the ground two miles northwest of the field, followed by an explosion and then it burst into flames killing Bolton instantly. Station Chaplain Littlewood officiated at the funeral on May 27. Six Leading Aircraftsmen acted as pallbearers and escorted Bolton’s remains to the train station for shipment to Toronto.

On June 5, LAC Alexander became the second fatality while flying at night. The funeral was held the next day at the Bullmore Funeral Home in Dauphin. Littlewood officiated and six confreres acted as escorts.

On June 17, the District Court Martial of Sgt. Tate commenced at 9 a.m. and adjourned at 5 p.m. On June 18 the sessions were completed and forwarded its findings.

On June 23 the court martial finding on Sgt. Pilot J.C. Tate was received and ordered to be promulgated (made known) at a full wing parade. Five squadrons were lined up at the parade ground. F/O J. Sinclair, station adjutant, read the findings. Tate was severely reprimanded and had $75 deducted from his pay. That was not bad of a price for flying low over a school yard and hitting an outhouse while trying to impress a lady school teacher. Dr. Medd, a doctor from Winnipegosis and part of the review board, stated that if the pilot could safely land a plane in distress then he would be an asset to the forces overseas.

On Saturday (Oct. 15) the SVRSS Tigers Boys’ Soccer team faced the Garden Valley Zodiacs for at shot at the Manitoba High School Athletic Association championship title. After maintaining their undefeated status all season, the Tigers fell 7-1 to a very strong Zodiacs team.

The U15 female Parkland Rangers attended the Hockey Manitoba U15 Female Showcase in Warren and Stonewall, last weekend, going 0-3 with their lone goal scored by Lily Nemetchek and assisted by Ava Cole.

The team is younger and inexperienced with only five returning players from last year’s team. The players used pink tape all weekend to support Breast Cancer Awareness Month.

The team opened its season, with their home opener, Oct. 14, losing 7-3 to Yellowhead. Madison Colon scored twice and Layne Minshull had the other goal. Nemetchek, Cole and Colon had assists and Olivia Brown made 26 saves in goal.

The next day, the Rangers lost on home ice, 9-1 to the Westman Wildcats, with Colon scoring the only goal unassisted. Morgan Gouldie recorded 47 saves in goal. On Oct. 16 in Brandon, the Rangers fell, 6-0, with Brown making 47 saves. 

By Ed Stozek
For the Herald

People born after World War II, between 1946 and 1964, are defined as baby boomers.

Today, the baby boomer generation is comprised of people aged 58 to 75 and continues to be the largest group in Canada numbering 9,212,640 in the 2021 census.

During my formative baby boomer years several unforgettable events occurred and still stand the test of time.

Every one of my vintage remembers the day that John F. Kennedy was assassinated. On Nov. 22, 1963, I was in Grade 6 and coming home from school. That day I caught a ride with my teacher and we heard about the assassination on the car radio. When I got dropped off at our farm, I quickly ran to the summer kitchen to announce the news. I can still picture my parents and Fred and Irene Wozney plucking chickens. My parents had just recently installed a black-and-white television set so later that evening it was quite the experience to watch the news program relating to the assassination.
Most baby boomers also remember the space race. On July 20, 1969, three American astronauts landed the Apollo 11 module on the moon. The Apollo 11 space program significantly advanced science and boosted the USA in its competition with the Soviet Union. It was amazing to watch the events unfold on television and hear Neil Armstrong’s famous words, “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” With an estimated audience of 125 to 150 million viewers, nearly half of the country’s TVs were tuned to CBS anchor Walter Cronkite and his side kick Wally Shirra, a former NASA astronaut.

“Oh, boy,” Cronkite said after the Eagle touched down in the Sea of Tranquility.

“Wally, say something, I'm speechless.” (cbsnews.com)

1969 also provided another “speechless’ event with three days that defined a generation. On Aug. 16 to 18, 1969, some 500,000 fans attended a three-day music festival located on a farm near the small town of Woodstock, New York. Long before the Internet and mass media, I didn’t pay much attention to the festival until 1970 when I started to attend university. Several friends and I went to the Evans Theatre to watch the movie, Woodstock.

In an era of great protest and unrest regarding the civil rights movement, Woodstock was an opportunity for young people to escape into music and spread a message of unity and love at a time when there was opposition to the US’s involvement in the Vietnam War. “The Vietnam Song” performed by Country Joe and the Fish was very prophetic.

The eight-game Canada-Russia exhibition hockey series during September 1972 captivated and united a large Canadian audience. On Saturday, Sept. 2, my parents had gone to a wedding in Dauphin. I had the house to myself to cheer as loud as I wanted to. I was at home prior to moving to Brandon to attend my third year of university. Like most hockey fans I had great expectations that Team Canada would easily defeat the Soviets. It was the first competition between the Soviet National team and a Canadian team represented by NHL professional hockey players.

Thirty seconds into the first period at the Montreal Forum, Canada scored the first goal. Six minutes later they scored the second goal. Soon the superior conditioning and team play of the Russians took over the game and Canada lost 7-3.

After losing game four at Vancouver, Phil Esposito delivered a speech stating how disappointed he was regarding the Canadian fans booing the team. He noted that the team gave it their best and played for the “love of our country.”

In Game 5 in Moscow Canada lost again and were down in the series 3 games to 1. After winning the next two games, Canadians across the country tuned in to watch the final game of the series. TVs were brought into schools and offices as the country came to a standstill. When Paul Henderson scored the winning goal with 34 seconds left to play in the game, the country erupted in celebrations and relished the greatest moment in Canada’s sport history.

As baby boomers we have had our share of some very memorable events during our formative years.

Dear Editor:

Once again, I find myself in a position where I must respond to, in this instant, a newsletter that has been circulated to residents of Russell Binscarth Municipality.

To my dismay, this newsletter is filled with misinformation, and inaccurate and false statements. It begins by making a statement about rumors within the municipality. For the mayor’s edification these are not rumors but are facts that the mayor and her CAO have been unwilling to answer or explain. I am assuming that the author of this document is the mayor since the pronoun “my” is used at the beginning of the newsletter.

More than one councilor noted that they knew nothing of the content of the newsletter until the document arrived in their mailboxes. The public meeting referred to in the first statement was in fact chaired by myself and provided an opportunity for Ms. Napier, to explain her position as it related to her firm’s intellectual property being pirated and distributed under a false pretence. The intent was to once and for all put an end to an issue that has stained the reputation of this municipality and by extension our communities! This was not a closed door meeting! Sadly, the only member(s) from council in attendance were councilor Estha Baseley and former councilor Marg Fraser. Ms. Napier’s presentation was not confrontational but she provided the evidence that in fact supported her claim. Council members had the opportunity along with their CAO to attend, to listen to her presentation and provide an explanation as to their CAO’s erroneous claim regarding the document.

To end all of this, an apology by council to Ms. Napier could have concluded the matter. Instead the mayor has chosen to keep this issue alive in the news letter by continuing to hopelessly defend actions of the CAO in this matter. I must also address the “in camera” issue because the author of the newsletter links this to a former structure of council management and claims that this lacked transparency. In camera sessions have never been part of the regular agenda of council meetings. This is a process that should be rarely used by any council. Its intent is to deal with an issue that requires a private discussion by councilors. In such a situation, a motion to meet “in camera” would be called for with a recorded vote. Following the “in camera” meeting, the issue would be brought back into the general session of the council meeting. The item could be tabled for discussion at a subsequent meeting, or it would be dealt with in the normal course of the same meeting.

Read the full letter in this week's Banner!

Dear Editor: It has been brought to my attention that a poster has surfaced publicly at both Post Offices a few times over this past week aiming to discredit me.

It has and will be removed by Postal Staff as it defies eligibility for what is allowed to be posted and no ownership is identified!

1) I resigned from MRB Council April 13, 2022.

2) Following the posting of the Draft April 26, 2022 meeting minutes, I was contacted by a Ratepayer inquiring if I had been DISQUALIFIED (I replied with “not to my knowledge”) as referred to in Resolution #97/2022 – (Sections 94/95 of the Municipal Act) ACKNOWLEDGING my Resignation.

3) May 4, 2022 I received the letter from Mayor & Council ACKNOWLEDGING my Resignation with an enclosed copy of Resolution #98/2022.

4) In the Municipal minutes there has not been a resolution regarding my Disqualification – had there been, an Appeal process could have happened at that time.

5) Senior Elections Officer confirmed with me, prior to taking my papers out, that following my resignation I was eligible to run for Mayor for the 2022 upcoming election.

Get this week's Russell Banner for more!

Dear Ms. Welwood:

I have been provided a copy of a municipal newsletter circulating in your community with yet another version of events regarding Mr. Fielder’s use of my intellectual property. I am thoroughly confused by the story I read. He states that he “found some practical information on the internet that provided guidance for municipalities” and that the “Manitoba Municipal Administrators liked the information and asked him to share it”.

When I contacted Mr. Fielder upon finding out he had taken my property and was utilizing it with his name as the author he stated, “I took it from another municipal website”. Let’s be clear, the plan he put forward to his Council as his is a word for word copy of my work and not “information used for guidance.” If indeed this was to be a generic use of good information, why then did he place his name on the title page as the author of the plan? Mr. Fielder says he was not aware the plan belonged to my company when he took it as his own, perhaps this is true, however he was definitely aware the work was not his own – and he led everyone to believe it was.

He then states that “he shared it with the disclaimer that he was not the author and thanked the original author for the material”. I printed the plan with his name on it right from the MMA website when I was notified and there was no disclaimer on it. A disclaimer would go on the document being shared so why is it not on the downloaded copy I printed directly from the website he shared it on? Why have I never heard about this disclaimer until now? If this is the case why did MMA not tell me about this when I called them in August of 2020 and informed them they were advertising my work on their website? I am curious why this is the first anyone has heard of the disclaimer? Mr. Fielder states that he offered me a “written and verbal apology”. Mr. Fielder has never apologized for his actions. I had one conversation with him when I discovered the theft of my work, at no time did he apologize and at no time did he state he had forwarded it with a disclaimer noting it was not his work.

If Mr. Fielder innocently used work that was not his, added in a disclaimer and shared it with an Association because he was “asked to do so” then why when he discovered that the plan belonged to me, did he not immediately inform his council of his actions. The information provided to all of you in the newsletter certainly sounds innocent, so my question is why did he not inform your council – his employer of what had transpired. His silence on this matter until confronted with the truth really speaks volumes more than anyone can say.

To read this full Letter to the Editor check out this week's Russell Banner!